Grantsmanship for Research and Career Development Activities

Curriculum

  • Types of Support and Review Processes for Research and Training Activities: Government Agencies
  • Types of Support and Review Processes for Research and Training Activities: Voluntary Health Organizations, Foundations, Industry, Clinical Trials, and Development
  • Identifying Appropriate Extramural Sources of Funding
    • Government and Non-Government Funding Agencies
    • Funding Programs Specific for Junior Investigators and Research Trainees
    • Funding Databases (Public and Commercial)
  • Planning, Organizing and Writing an Individual Fellowship Proposal - NIH F30/F31/F32 Applications used as References
  • Planning, Organizing and Writing Career Transition and Career Development Proposals - NIH K01/K08/K23/K25/K99(R00) Applications used as References
    • Overview of NIH’s Career Transition and Career Development Funding Mechanisms
    • Funding Announcements and Notices
    • NIH Review Process
      • Allowed number of applications
      • Requesting the most appropriate Study Section
      • By the Numbers (Impact Scores, % Ranking, Paylines, Success Rates)
      • Timeline from Application Submission to Award Notice
      • Review Criteria: Overall and for Each Component of the Application
    • Career Transition and Career Development Applications
      • What are the Many Required Components?
      • Completing Each Component vis a vis NIH’s Instructions and Review Criteria: Approaches for Competitive Applications
  • Planning, Organizing and Writing a Research Proposal – NIH R01 Application used as a Reference
    • Overview of NIH’s R01 Funding Mechanism
    • R01 Review Process (e.g., Allowed number of applications, Requesting the most appropriate Study Section)
    • R01 By the Numbers (Impact Scores, % Ranking, Paylines, Success Rates)
    • R01 Funding Announcements and Notices
    • What Does it Mean to be an “Early Stage Investigator” (ESI)?
    • R01 Research Plan: Before You Start Writing
    • R01 Research Plan: Review Criteria and Considerations; including NIH's new "Simplified Peer Review Framework"
    • Specific Aims
    • Research Plan: Significance, Innovation, Approach
    • “Rigor and Reproducibility”
    • Other Application Components
      • e.g., Abstract, Vertebrate Animals, Subcontracts, Letters of Support, Resource Sharing Plan(s), Data Management and Sharing Plan, Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources, Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information, Facilities & Other Resources
  • Budget and Budget Justification
  • NIH Biosketch
  • NIH’s Loan Repayment Program
  • Best Practices for Competitive Research, Career Development and Individual Fellowship Grant Applications
  • Commons Mistakes of 1st Time Applicants
  • How to Effectively Respond to Reviewers’ Comments in Resubmission Applications
  • Developing Effective “Specific Aims” and the Impact on Other Components of the Application
  • Becoming a Principal Investigator: Career Timeline and Milestones
    • Research Knowledge Base, Research Skill Sets, Selecting Mentors and Advisors, Communication, Mentoring, Peer Review, Networking, Research Compliance, Good Citizenship, Community Outreach, Funding to Support Your Research/Grant Writing, Academic Career Search, Principal Investigator of a Research Group
  • Transitioning to Research Independence: Funding and Grantsmanship for Newly Independent Investigators
  • Best Practices for Competitive NIH Institutional Research Training Grant Applications
    • Why are NIH Training Grants so Important to an Institution’s Research Enterprise?
    • Selection of Trainees
    • Selection of Mentors
    • Program Plan
      • Completing the Required Sections
      • Organization and Training Committees
      • Template Figures & Tables
    • Data Tables: How to Complete and Highlight Strengths of Training Program
    • Letters of Support
    • Multi PI Proposals
    • Training in “Responsible Conduct of Research” and “Enhancing Reproducibility”
    • How to Effectively Respond to Reviewers’ Comments in Resubmission Applications
  • Experiences of a Peer Reviewer and an "Inside Look" of an Extramural Grant Review Panel
  • Practice of Seeking Grant Support: Tips from an Experienced Researcher at Columbia
Back to top